Corentin Denolly vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 May at 09:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Denolly vs N. Budkov Kjaer

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Denolly 1 - 0 Kjaer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Corentin Denolly winning 2 and Nicolai Budkov Kjaer winning 0. The last match between Corentin Denolly and Nicolai Budkov Kjaer was at the Skopje Challenger, 20-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Denolly | 1 |
| Kjaer | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Skopje Challenger(05-20-25)
C. Denolly vs N. B. Kjaer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $58,345 |
| 62.28% (431-261) | Career Total W/L | 65.52% (76-40) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.50% (3-5) |
C. Denolly vs N. B. Kjaer Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performances indicate Denolly has a slight advantage, winning 44.54% of points compared to Kjaer's 43.13%. Could this minor edge be influential in the match outcome?
- Regarding return games, Denolly outperforms Kjaer in second serve returns with 47.54% success versus 42.6%. However, Kjaer slightly edges out in first serve returns at 28.07% versus Denolly's 26.13%.
- Under pressure, Denolly demonstrates a marginally better breakpoint save rate, achieving 51.47% compared to Kjaer's 49.8%.
- The overall match performance in the past year favors Denolly, who boasts a 60.56% win rate, slightly higher than Kjaer's 58.33%.
- Surface preferences differ: Denolly excels on clay with a 66% win rate, whereas Kjaer is stronger on indoor hard courts, with a 68% win rate.
- Denolly has mainly competed in lower-level events but shows a high win rate of 79.41%, while Kjaer's experience at higher-level events comes with a 58.33% success rate.
- Opponent quality also favors Denolly, having faced slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 314.11, compared to Kjaer's average opponent rank of 321.4.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Denolly shows superior results, winning 75% of such situations compared to Kjaer’s 56%.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Kjaer is more efficient, converting 35% of opportunities, whereas Denolly manages 31.65%.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance data and head-to-head statistics, Denolly presents a strong case with slightly better second serve success and return game proficiency. Despite playing at lower tournament levels, their win percentage stands impressively high.
Moreover, Denolly's ability to handle pressure and excel in deciding sets gives them an added advantage. Kjaer, while performing well in breakpoint conversion, might struggle if the match extends into a tightly contested scenario.
Given these factors and despite Kjaer’s strengths on indoor hard courts, Denolly’s overall consistent edge in crucial game aspects suggests they are more likely to emerge victoriously in this matchup.
Corentin Denolly vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Denolly vs N. B. Kjaer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:24:38 | Average Match Time | 2:24:38 |
| 68% (50/74) | 1st Serve % | 65% (58/89) |
| 64% (32/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (30/58) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (11/31) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 23% (3/13) |
| 54% (48/89) | Return Points Win % | 42% (31/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Denolly Recent Matches Played
N. B. Kjaer Recent Matches Played

C. Denolly vs N. B. Kjaer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.28% (431/261) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.52% (76/40) |
| 59.73% (942/635) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.17% (166/101) |
| 53.81% (7899/6781) | Games Win/Loss | 53.74% (1365/1175) |
| 55.45% (61/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.16% (12/7) |
| 65.55% (312/164) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.07% (37/19) |
| 55.24% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.57% (24/11) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2070 | Aces Total | 383 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2021 | Total Double Faults | 276 |
| 1:27:19 | Average Match Time | 1:34:40 |
| 508.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.56 |
| 65% (27904/42909) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4605/7425) |
| 67% (18746/27904) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3132/4605) |
| 49% (7296/15006) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1459/2820) |
| 45% (2204/4870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (346/766) |
| 43% (18571/43547) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3070/7407) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 42.75% (56/75) | Challenger W/L | 68.33% (41/19) |
| 67.15% (370/181) | Futures W/L | 74.29% (26/9) |
| 63% (427/682) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (76/115) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (106/189) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 69% (22/32) |
| 59% (118/201) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (22/36) |
| 90% (416/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (69/63) |
| 10% (416/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (69/6) |
| 20% (276/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (47/13) |